
What LitmusChaos Can’t Test, Keploy Cancatch what breaks
CNCF Chaos Engineering Platform for Kubernetes
Keploy auto-generates API tests from real production traffic using eBPF for regression testing, while LitmusChaos is a CNCF chaos engineering platform that injects failures into Kubernetes environments to test system resilience. Keploy validates correct behavior; LitmusChaos validates that systems recover gracefully from infrastructure failures.
How Keploy turns real traffic into a test suite
One pipeline, running the moment your app receives a request. No SDKs, no sidecars, no test scripts — just kernel-level capture that becomes deterministic regression coverage.
- 01Real API trafficLive requests + responses from your running app
- 02eBPF captureKernel-level recording — zero code changes
- 03NormalizeTime-freeze + field noise removed automatically
- 04Generate testsDeterministic test cases from actual behavior
- 05Generate mocksEvery downstream dependency stubbed for you
- 06Replay in CIRuns locally, in CI, or in-cluster on Kubernetes
- 07Regression detectionDiffs flagged before they reach production
See how the capture-replay engine works under the hood.
Trusted by engineering teams at scale




















































Why teams switch from LitmusChaos
Keploy eliminates manual test authoring by generating tests automatically from real traffic — no scripts, no stubs, no infrastructure setup.
Your primary need is functional regression testing of API behavior
You want auto-generated tests from real traffic with dependency mocks
You need to validate that code changes do not break existing functionality
The numbers behind the switch
Industry data on how much manual testing costs teams — and what Keploy delivers from the first recording session.
Writing tests, configuring mocks, debugging flakiness — not building features that ship.
A routine rename or interface change silently invalidates more than half your suite.
Keploy generates tests from every request your API actually handles — no guessing.
Traffic capture reaches edge cases, error paths, and concurrent requests no dev would write.
Pain stats sourced from developer productivity surveys. Coverage stats from Keploy production recording sessions across 50+ engineering teams.
Every number here comes from teams running Keploy in CI.
Zero code. Real tests. Automatically.
Keploy's eBPF agent intercepts every API call at the kernel level and turns live traffic into test cases with dependency mocks — no SDK, no sidecars, no annotations.
Incoming API Requests
Every API call your app makes gets captured, replayed as a test, and its dependencies auto-mocked — continuously, from real traffic.
How they compare, dimension by dimension
A logical breakdown across the dimensions that matter. Click any row for real-world KPI impact across industries.
Auto-generates from real API traffic via eBPF
Pre-built chaos experiments for Kubernetes failure injection
Zero code changes needed for test generation
No code changes; YAML-based chaos experiment definitions
Auto-generates mocks for all external dependencies
No mocks; deliberately breaks real infrastructure
Native CI/CD pipeline integration with CLI
CI/CD integration via Litmus CLI and GitHub Actions
Language-agnostic via eBPF traffic capture
Language-agnostic; operates at infrastructure layer
Apache 2.0 licensed with 20K+ GitHub stars
Apache 2.0 licensed, CNCF Incubating project
Click any dimension to see real-world KPI impact across industries.
Dive into how each capability actually works.
Your tests miss more than you think
Manual tests cover paths developers remember to write — usually just the happy path. Keploy captures every pattern production traffic actually generates.
Coverage grid shows 8 common endpoints × 10 production scenario types. Manual tests cover only what developers remember to write. Keploy captures every pattern your API actually serves in production.
Keploy is open source — read the code that captures this coverage.
The infrastructure you're maintaining
Traditional testing stacks require a shadow infrastructure to exist alongside your real app. Keploy eliminates all of it — tests and mocks come from actual traffic, not from services you run and maintain.
How they work differently
Architectural differences that affect workflow, cost, and velocity.
Keploy captures API traffic and generates replay-based integration tests that verify correct system behavior under normal conditions. It ensures that code changes do not break existing functionality by comparing responses against captured baselines. The focus is on functional correctness.
LitmusChaos injects controlled failures (pod kills, network delays, disk pressure, CPU stress) into Kubernetes clusters to test how applications handle infrastructure problems. It validates resilience, fault tolerance, and recovery mechanisms. The focus is on system behavior under abnormal conditions.
When to use each tool
Specific scenarios where each tool delivers the most value.
Keploy is the better fit when…
- Your primary need is functional regression testing of API behavior
- You want auto-generated tests from real traffic with dependency mocks
- You need to validate that code changes do not break existing functionality
- You want fast, deterministic tests that run in every CI pipeline
- You need language-agnostic API testing without infrastructure experiments
LitmusChaos is the better fit when…
- You need to validate Kubernetes application resilience under failure
- You want to test disaster recovery and fault tolerance mechanisms
- Your SRE team needs to inject controlled chaos into staging or production
- You require CNCF-certified chaos engineering for compliance purposes
- You want to validate auto-scaling, circuit breakers, and retry logic
Compare the full workflow for your own stack.
The workflow you're escaping
Same starting point, same finish line. One path is short because Keploy does the tedious middle for you — the other is where teams lose days every sprint.
Without Keploy (LitmusChaos / manual)
Every dependency is your problem, and every code change ripples back through the test suite you hand-built.
With Keploy
Record once from real traffic, replay anywhere. Tests and mocks are generated and stay in sync automatically.
Cut the maintenance middle out of your test suite.
The test maintenance trap
With LitmusChaos, every feature commit generates a hidden tax — a follow-up "fix tests" commit. The commit history tells the whole story.
Deterministic replays, no flaky tests — see how.
Switch from LitmusChaos in minutes
Choose the path that fits your workflow. Both are up and running the same day.
Install, record real API traffic, then replay it as regression tests — zero code changes, zero framework dependencies.
# 1. Installcurl --silent -O https://keploy.io/install.sh && source install.sh# 2. Record your traffickeploy record -c "your-start-command"# 3. Replay as testskeploy test -c "your-start-command" --delay 10Paste your cURLs, drop in an OpenAPI spec or Postman collection, and click Generate. Keploy builds your test suite in seconds.
Real-world scenarios
How Keploy handles the challenges your team actually faces.
Validating Microservices After Code Changes
Keploy replays captured production traffic against the updated services, comparing responses to detect regressions. Auto-generated mocks isolate each service, making it clear which change caused a test failure.
LitmusChaos does not validate code changes. It tests whether the system handles infrastructure failures gracefully. A code change might pass chaos tests but still have functional regressions that only Keploy would catch.
Testing Kubernetes Pod Failure Recovery
Keploy cannot simulate infrastructure failures. It tests that APIs return correct responses under normal conditions but does not verify that your application recovers when pods are killed or nodes go down.
LitmusChaos kills pods, introduces network partitions, and stresses CPU/memory to verify that your application recovers correctly. It validates that Kubernetes self-healing, circuit breakers, and retry logic work as expected.
Join the teams shipping with confidence on Keploy.
What you write vs what Keploy writes
The same test coverage — one approach takes hours of setup and ongoing maintenance, the other takes five minutes and zero boilerplate.
Every new endpoint needs a new file. Every refactor breaks tests. Every non-deterministic value (timestamps, IDs) needs custom handling.
Keploy captures the real request, response, and all dependency calls. Non-deterministic fields are auto-detected and excluded from assertions.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about choosing between Keploy and LitmusChaos.
Still have questions? The docs and community can help.
Looking for a LitmusChaos alternative?
Engineering teams evaluating LitmusChaos alternatives often compare it with Keploy for API testing and regression coverage. Keploy captures real production traffic via eBPF and auto-generates tests with dependency mocks — requiring zero code changes. The key differences come down to how tests are generated (traffic-based vs manual), how dependencies are mocked (automatic vs configured), and what infrastructure changes are needed (none vs SDK/sidecar/containers).
Ready to stop writing tests manually?
Keploy captures your real API traffic and turns it into a regression suite automatically. Zero code changes. Full coverage from day one.