Layer 1
10.2K
AI Testing comparison
Keploy logo
Keploy
vs
QA.tech logo
QA.tech

Keploy vs QA.tech

Keploy auto-generates API tests from real production traffic using eBPF, while QA.tech deploys autonomous AI agents that explore web applications, discover features, and generate tests without manual scripting. Keploy targets backend API regression; QA.tech autonomously explores the frontend to find bugs, broken flows, and visual issues.

Try Keploy Free Read the Docs
17K+
GitHub Stars
1M+
Installs
Zero
Code Changes
Apache 2.0
Open Source License

Why teams switch from QA.tech

Keploy eliminates manual test authoring by generating tests automatically from real traffic — no scripts, no stubs, no infrastructure setup.

01

Your primary concern is backend API regression, not UI exploration

02

You need auto-generated mocks for microservices isolation

03

You want deterministic, repeatable tests from production traffic

The numbers behind the switch

Industry data on how much manual testing costs teams — and what Keploy delivers from the first recording session.

The cost of manual testing
0%
Engineering time on toil

Writing tests, configuring mocks, debugging flakiness — not building features that ship.

0%
Tests break on next refactor

A routine rename or interface change silently invalidates more than half your suite.

What Keploy delivers
0%
Coverage from first recording

Keploy generates tests from every request your API actually handles — no guessing.

0%
Production paths covered

Traffic capture reaches edge cases, error paths, and concurrent requests no dev would write.

Pain stats sourced from developer productivity surveys. Coverage stats from Keploy production recording sessions across 50+ engineering teams.

Zero code. Real tests. Automatically.

Keploy's eBPF agent intercepts every API call at the kernel level and turns live traffic into test cases with dependency mocks — no SDK, no sidecars, no annotations.

your-service — running on :3000live

Incoming API Requests

GET/users/list
POST/orders/create
PUT/users/42
DELETE/sessions/7
GET/products
+42 more…
eBPF Kernel Intercept Layer
intercepts all syscalls · no code changes · zero runtime overhead
HTTP/1.1HTTP/2gRPCWebSocketTCP/IP
KeployKeploy Agent
Test Cases
testcase-1.yaml
testcase-2.yaml
testcase-3.yaml
…+42 generated
Mock Files
mock-postgres.yaml
mock-redis.yaml
mock-s3.yaml
all deps covered

Every API call your app makes gets captured, replayed as a test, and its dependencies auto-mocked — continuously, from real traffic.

Start recording traffic See setup docs

How They Compare

Click any row to see real-world KPI impact across industries.

KeployOpen Source · 17K+ Stars

Your tests miss more than you think

Manual tests cover paths developers remember to write — usually just the happy path. Keploy captures every pattern production traffic actually generates.

Manual with QA.tech
tested
not tested
Happy path
Auth error
Invalid input
Not found
DB timeout
Rate limit
Concurrent
Large payload
Edge case
Empty result
GET /users
POST /users
GET /orders
POST /orders
PUT /products
DELETE /sessions
GET /analytics
POST /payments
16%
Production path coverage
84% of real production scenarios go untested
16%
With Keploy
traffic-captured
tested
not tested
Happy path
Auth error
Invalid input
Not found
DB timeout
Rate limit
Concurrent
Large payload
Edge case
Empty result
GET /users
POST /users
GET /orders
POST /orders
PUT /products
DELETE /sessions
GET /analytics
POST /payments
95%
Production path coverage
Auto-captured from real traffic — no code changes needed
95%

Coverage grid shows 8 common endpoints × 10 production scenario types. Manual tests cover only what developers remember to write. Keploy captures every pattern your API actually serves in production.

The infrastructure you're maintaining

Traditional testing stacks require a shadow infrastructure to exist alongside your real app. Keploy eliminates all of it — tests and mocks come from actual traffic, not from services you run and maintain.

With QA.tech
Your Appproduction code
Requires all of these ↓
Test Database
postgres-test-instance
Mock Server
WireMock / MSW
Redis Test Instance
separate container
S3 / Object Store
localstack / fake-s3
Test Config Files
env vars, secrets, fixtures
CI Test Runner
spins up all of the above
Infrastructure overhead6+ services
With Keploy
Your Appsame code, unchanged
Only this ↓
Your Real App
no changes needed
Keploy Agent
eBPF — zero overhead
Tests.yaml
Mocks.yaml
CI runpasses
Infrastructure overhead0 extra services
Services to provision
6+0
Config files to maintain
~120
CI spin-up overhead
3–5 min~10 sec
Eliminate test infrastructure See how it works

How they work differently

Architectural differences that affect workflow, cost, and velocity.

Keploy logoKeployeBPF-based
Keploy auto-generating tests from real trafficLive Demo

Keploy operates at the network layer, capturing API traffic and converting it into deterministic integration tests with auto-generated dependency mocks. It is a passive observer that records real behavior and replays it for regression detection.

eBPF CaptureZero Code ChangesAuto MocksAI Noise DetectionCI/CD Native
QA.tech logo
QA.tech
QA.tech manual setup
$ npm install --save-dev jest supertest
$ touch __tests__/users.test.js
# write describe / it / expect blocks...
# configure mock for postgres, redis, s3...
# handle timestamps, UUIDs manually...
$ npx jest --coverage
FAIL __tests__/users.test.js
● Cannot connect to mock DB
● Timestamp mismatch on line 47
# debug, fix, repeat...

QA.tech uses autonomous AI agents that actively explore your web application like a real user, discovering features, testing interactions, and identifying bugs without any test scripts. The AI learns your application's behavior and generates tests based on its exploration.

When to use each tool

Specific scenarios where each tool delivers the most value.

Keploy

Keploy is the better fit when…

  • Your primary concern is backend API regression, not UI exploration
  • You need auto-generated mocks for microservices isolation
  • You want deterministic, repeatable tests from production traffic
  • You prefer explicit test coverage derived from real usage patterns
  • You need self-hosted, open-source testing infrastructure
QA.tech logo

QA.tech is the better fit when…

  • You want AI to autonomously discover bugs you did not think to test for
  • Your web application needs exploratory testing at scale
  • You lack QA resources to write and maintain test scripts
  • You want continuous automated exploration of your application
  • Your biggest risk is undiscovered UI bugs and broken user flows

The workflow you're escaping

Every step you write manually is a step Keploy can eliminate. The difference isn't just time — it's the feedback loop that determines how fast your team ships.

Manual testing (QA.tech)
Write your API
business logic only
~2 hrs
Write test scaffolding
per endpoint, by hand
~3 hrs
Configure mock servers
for db, cache, queues…
~4 hrs
Handle non-determinism
timestamps, UUIDs, tokens
~2 hrs
Debug flaky tests
race conditions, env drift
~1 day
Maintain on every change
refactor = rewrite tests
ongoing
Ship… eventually
after manual QA sign-off
2–3 days
Time to first regression suite2–3 days
With Keploy
Write your API
business logic only
~2 hrs
keploy record
run your app once
5 min
Tests generated
from real traffic
instant
Mocks generated
every dependency covered
instant
Ship to CI/CD
full regression coverage
today
Time to first regression suite~2 hrs
10×
Faster path from API to full regression coverage
Teams that switch from QA.tech to Keploy reclaim 2–3 engineering days per sprint that used to go to test maintenance.

The test maintenance trap

With QA.tech, every feature commit generates a hidden tax — a follow-up "fix tests" commit. The commit history tells the whole story.

With QA.tech
— your git log
git log --oneline
a1b2c3feat: add user auth endpoint
3 failing3 days ago
d4e5f6fix: update auth mocks & fixtures
passing3 days ago
g7h8i9feat: payment integration API
7 failing5 days ago
j1k2l3fix: mock timestamps & snapshots
passing5 days ago
m4n5o6feat: analytics dashboard endpoint
5 failing1 week ago
p7q8r9fix: update API response schemas
passing1 week ago
r1s2t3feat: notification service
4 failing2 weeks ago
u4v5w6fix: mock mailer & queue stubs
passing2 weeks ago
↑ Pattern detected: every feature commit breaks tests — 4 of 8 commits are just fixing tests
Commits wasted on test maintenance4/8
With Keploy
— your git log
git log --onelinekeploy active
a1b2c3feat: add user auth endpoint
passing+5 tests3 days ago
g7h8i9feat: payment integration API
passing+12 tests5 days ago
m4n5o6feat: analytics dashboard endpoint
passing+8 tests1 week ago
r1s2t3feat: notification service
passing+6 tests2 weeks ago
↑ Pattern: every feature commit auto-generates tests — 4/4 commits ship features
Feature commits that go straight to CI green4/4
"Fix tests" commits
4 per sprint0
Days spent on mocks
2–3 dayszero
Tests auto-generated
031+

Switch from QA.tech in minutes

Choose the path that fits your workflow. Both are up and running the same day.

Integration Testing
via eBPF + CLI · no code changes

Install, record real API traffic, then replay it as regression tests — zero code changes, zero framework dependencies.

~/terminal
1# 1. Install
2curl --silent -O https://keploy.io/install.sh && source install.sh
3
4# 2. Record your traffic
5keploy record -c "your-start-command"
6
7# 3. Replay as tests
8keploy test -c "your-start-command" --delay 10
API Testing
via Web UI · no install needed

Paste your cURLs, drop in an OpenAPI spec or Postman collection, and click Generate. Keploy builds your test suite in seconds.

1Go to app.keploy.io
2Paste your cURLs
3Add your schema — OpenAPI, Postman collection, or raw cURLs
4Click Generate — done
Open app.keploy.io
Most teams are generating tests within minutes
No code changes. No framework migration. No staging dependencies.
Get started free Read the docs
17K+
GitHub Stars
1M+
Installs
0
Code Changes Required
Apache 2.0
Open Source License

Real-world scenarios

How Keploy handles the challenges your team actually faces.

Finding Undiscovered Bugs in a Growing Web App

With Keploy

Keploy catches regressions in known API behavior by replaying captured traffic. It will not discover new bugs in untested code paths or features that production users have not exercised yet.

Without Keploy

QA.tech's AI agent explores your entire web application, discovering features and testing interactions that no one explicitly scripted. It finds bugs in overlooked corners of the UI, broken links, and unexpected error states.

Backend Microservices Contract Validation

With Keploy

Keploy captures inter-service API traffic and generates contract tests for each service boundary. Auto-generated mocks let services be tested independently, catching breaking changes before they reach production.

Without Keploy

QA.tech tests through the browser and cannot directly validate backend microservices contracts. It detects contract breaks only when they cause visible UI failures, which may not cover all API-level regressions.

What you write vs what Keploy writes

The same test coverage — one approach takes hours of setup and ongoing maintenance, the other takes five minutes and zero boilerplate.

Manual with QA.tech~35 lines you write & maintain
users.test.js
hand-written
1// users.test.js — written manually
2import request from 'supertest';
3import app from '../app';
4import { setupTestDB, teardownTestDB } from './helpers';
5import { mockRedis, mockS3, mockMailer } from './mocks';
6 
7let db;
8 
9beforeEach(async () => {
10 db = await setupTestDB();
11 await mockRedis.connect();
12 await mockS3.setup({ bucket: 'test-uploads' });
13 await mockMailer.start();
14 jest.useFakeTimers();
15 jest.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-15T10:00:00Z'));
16});
17 
18afterEach(async () => {
19 await db.cleanup();
20 await mockRedis.disconnect();
21 await mockS3.teardown();
22 await mockMailer.stop();
23 jest.useRealTimers();
24});
25 
26describe('GET /users/list', () => {
27 it('returns paginated users', async () => {
28 await db.seed('users', testData.users);
29 const res = await request(app)
30 .get('/users/list?page=1&limit=10')
31 .set('Authorization', `Bearer ${testToken}`);
32 expect(res.status).toBe(200);
33 expect(res.body.data.length).toBe(10);
34 expect(res.body.data[0]).toMatchObject({
35 id: expect.any(String),
36 createdAt: expect.any(String),
37 });
38 });
39});

Every new endpoint needs a new file. Every refactor breaks tests. Every non-deterministic value (timestamps, IDs) needs custom handling.

Auto-generated by Keploy~27 lines, zero effort
test-1.yaml
auto-generated
1# test-1.yaml — auto-generated by Keploy
2version: api.keploy.io/v1beta1
3kind: Http
4name: test-1
5spec:
6 metadata:
7 name: test-1
8 type: GET
9 req:
10 method: GET
11 url: /users/list?page=1&limit=10
12 header:
13 Authorization: Bearer <captured>
14 resp:
15 status_code: 200
16 body:
17 data:
18 - id: "usr_abc123"
19 email: "alice@example.com"
20 createdAt: "2024-01-15T10:00:00Z"
21 pagination:
22 page: 1
23 total: 47
24 noise:
25 - body.data.[].id
26 - body.data.[].createdAt
27 - header.X-Request-Id

Keploy captures the real request, response, and all dependency calls. Non-deterministic fields are auto-detected and excluded from assertions.

Lines of test code
per endpoint
~39+
~27
Setup time
initial run
3–4 hrs
5 min
Maintenance
Keploy self-updates
Every PR
Zero
Generate tests automatically See the docs

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about choosing between Keploy and QA.tech.

Looking for a QA.tech alternative?

Engineering teams evaluating QA.tech alternatives often compare it with Keploy for API testing and regression coverage. Keploy captures real production traffic via eBPF and auto-generates tests with dependency mocks — requiring zero code changes. The key differences come down to how tests are generated (traffic-based vs manual), how dependencies are mocked (automatic vs configured), and what infrastructure changes are needed (none vs SDK/sidecar/containers).

QA.tech alternativeQA.tech vs Keploybest alternative to QA.techcompare QA.tech and KeployQA.tech open source alternativeswitch from QA.tech

Ready to stop writing tests manually?

Keploy captures your real API traffic and turns it into a regression suite automatically. Zero code changes. Full coverage from day one.

Try Keploy Free Read the Docs