Keploy vs Roost.ai
Keploy auto-generates API integration tests from real production traffic using eBPF, while Roost.ai uses AI to generate tests for microservices from code analysis and API specifications. Keploy derives tests from observed production behavior; Roost.ai generates tests from code understanding, targeting microservices architecture patterns specifically.
Why teams switch from Roost.ai
Keploy eliminates manual test authoring by generating tests automatically from real traffic — no scripts, no stubs, no infrastructure setup.
You want tests derived from real production traffic, not code analysis
You need auto-generated mocks from actual dependency responses
You prefer a proven open-source tool with a large community
The numbers behind the switch
Industry data on how much manual testing costs teams — and what Keploy delivers from the first recording session.
Writing tests, configuring mocks, debugging flakiness — not building features that ship.
A routine rename or interface change silently invalidates more than half your suite.
Keploy generates tests from every request your API actually handles — no guessing.
Traffic capture reaches edge cases, error paths, and concurrent requests no dev would write.
Pain stats sourced from developer productivity surveys. Coverage stats from Keploy production recording sessions across 50+ engineering teams.
Zero code. Real tests. Automatically.
Keploy's eBPF agent intercepts every API call at the kernel level and turns live traffic into test cases with dependency mocks — no SDK, no sidecars, no annotations.
Incoming API Requests
Every API call your app makes gets captured, replayed as a test, and its dependencies auto-mocked — continuously, from real traffic.
How They Compare
Click any row to see real-world KPI impact across industries.
Your tests miss more than you think
Manual tests cover paths developers remember to write — usually just the happy path. Keploy captures every pattern production traffic actually generates.
Coverage grid shows 8 common endpoints × 10 production scenario types. Manual tests cover only what developers remember to write. Keploy captures every pattern your API actually serves in production.
The infrastructure you're maintaining
Traditional testing stacks require a shadow infrastructure to exist alongside your real app. Keploy eliminates all of it — tests and mocks come from actual traffic, not from services you run and maintain.
How they work differently
Architectural differences that affect workflow, cost, and velocity.
Live DemoKeploy captures live API traffic using eBPF and generates replay-ready integration tests with auto-generated mocks for all dependencies. Tests reflect actual production behavior including real data patterns and edge cases. No code analysis or API specifications are needed.
Roost.ai analyzes microservices code and API contracts to generate integration and unit tests using AI. It understands service boundaries, dependency patterns, and API schemas to create tests that validate microservices interactions. The platform is specifically designed for cloud-native and microservices architectures.
When to use each tool
Specific scenarios where each tool delivers the most value.
Keploy is the better fit when…
- You want tests derived from real production traffic, not code analysis
- You need auto-generated mocks from actual dependency responses
- You prefer a proven open-source tool with a large community
- You want language-agnostic testing via network-level capture
- You need zero code changes and no specification requirements
Roost.ai is the better fit when…
- You want AI-generated tests based on code and API contract analysis
- Your APIs are in development with no production traffic yet
- You need tests that understand microservices design patterns specifically
- You want test generation that analyzes code structure and dependencies
- You prefer a tool specifically designed for microservices test generation
The workflow you're escaping
Every step you write manually is a step Keploy can eliminate. The difference isn't just time — it's the feedback loop that determines how fast your team ships.
The test maintenance trap
With Roost.ai, every feature commit generates a hidden tax — a follow-up "fix tests" commit. The commit history tells the whole story.
Switch from Roost.ai in minutes
Choose the path that fits your workflow. Both are up and running the same day.
Install, record real API traffic, then replay it as regression tests — zero code changes, zero framework dependencies.
# 1. Installcurl --silent -O https://keploy.io/install.sh && source install.sh# 2. Record your traffickeploy record -c "your-start-command"# 3. Replay as testskeploy test -c "your-start-command" --delay 10Paste your cURLs, drop in an OpenAPI spec or Postman collection, and click Generate. Keploy builds your test suite in seconds.
Real-world scenarios
How Keploy handles the challenges your team actually faces.
Testing a New Microservice Before Production Launch
Keploy needs production traffic to generate tests, so it cannot create tests for a service that has not been deployed yet. It becomes useful once the service is live and handling real requests.
Roost.ai analyzes the new service's code and API contracts to generate tests before production launch. It creates tests from code understanding, giving you coverage from the first deployment.
Regression Testing Across 30 Interdependent Services
Keploy captures inter-service traffic and generates integration tests for all 30 services with auto-generated mocks. Tests reflect actual production interaction patterns and include real data. The suite runs in CI without any service needing to be live.
Roost.ai analyzes code across the services and generates tests based on dependency graphs and API contracts. Tests cover documented interaction patterns but may miss undocumented behaviors that only appear in production traffic.
What you write vs what Keploy writes
The same test coverage — one approach takes hours of setup and ongoing maintenance, the other takes five minutes and zero boilerplate.
Every new endpoint needs a new file. Every refactor breaks tests. Every non-deterministic value (timestamps, IDs) needs custom handling.
Keploy captures the real request, response, and all dependency calls. Non-deterministic fields are auto-detected and excluded from assertions.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about choosing between Keploy and Roost.ai.
Looking for a Roost.ai alternative?
Engineering teams evaluating Roost.ai alternatives often compare it with Keploy for API testing and regression coverage. Keploy captures real production traffic via eBPF and auto-generates tests with dependency mocks — requiring zero code changes. The key differences come down to how tests are generated (traffic-based vs manual), how dependencies are mocked (automatic vs configured), and what infrastructure changes are needed (none vs SDK/sidecar/containers).
Ready to stop writing tests manually?
Keploy captures your real API traffic and turns it into a regression suite automatically. Zero code changes. Full coverage from day one.
