Keploy vs Starterly
Keploy generates integration tests from real API traffic using eBPF without any code changes, while Starterly uses AI to generate unit tests from code analysis. Keploy captures actual production behavior with auto-generated mocks, whereas Starterly focuses on AI-driven unit test creation for individual functions and methods.
Why teams switch from Starterly
Keploy eliminates manual test authoring by generating tests automatically from real traffic — no scripts, no stubs, no infrastructure setup.
You need integration tests generated from real production traffic patterns
Your team wants zero-code-change test generation with eBPF capture
You need auto-generated mocks for databases and external dependencies
The numbers behind the switch
Industry data on how much manual testing costs teams — and what Keploy delivers from the first recording session.
Writing tests, configuring mocks, debugging flakiness — not building features that ship.
A routine rename or interface change silently invalidates more than half your suite.
Keploy generates tests from every request your API actually handles — no guessing.
Traffic capture reaches edge cases, error paths, and concurrent requests no dev would write.
Pain stats sourced from developer productivity surveys. Coverage stats from Keploy production recording sessions across 50+ engineering teams.
Zero code. Real tests. Automatically.
Keploy's eBPF agent intercepts every API call at the kernel level and turns live traffic into test cases with dependency mocks — no SDK, no sidecars, no annotations.
Incoming API Requests
Every API call your app makes gets captured, replayed as a test, and its dependencies auto-mocked — continuously, from real traffic.
How They Compare
Click any row to see real-world KPI impact across industries.
Your tests miss more than you think
Manual tests cover paths developers remember to write — usually just the happy path. Keploy captures every pattern production traffic actually generates.
Coverage grid shows 8 common endpoints × 10 production scenario types. Manual tests cover only what developers remember to write. Keploy captures every pattern your API actually serves in production.
The infrastructure you're maintaining
Traditional testing stacks require a shadow infrastructure to exist alongside your real app. Keploy eliminates all of it — tests and mocks come from actual traffic, not from services you run and maintain.
How they work differently
Architectural differences that affect workflow, cost, and velocity.
Live DemoKeploy captures real API traffic using eBPF and converts it into replayable integration tests with auto-generated mocks and stubs. No code changes or test writing is needed. Time-freezing and normalization handle non-deterministic data automatically.
Starterly uses AI to analyze source code and generate unit tests for functions and methods. It focuses on increasing code coverage through automated test creation. The platform generates tests based on code structure analysis rather than runtime behavior.
When to use each tool
Specific scenarios where each tool delivers the most value.
Keploy is the better fit when…
- You need integration tests generated from real production traffic patterns
- Your team wants zero-code-change test generation with eBPF capture
- You need auto-generated mocks for databases and external dependencies
- You prefer open-source self-hosted testing with Apache 2.0 licensing
- You want to test actual API behavior rather than code-level unit logic
Starterly is the better fit when…
- Your primary need is unit test generation for individual functions
- You want AI to write tests based on code analysis and structure
- Your team needs quick unit test coverage for new codebases
- You prefer a managed platform focused specifically on unit testing
- You want test generation without needing a traffic capture environment
The workflow you're escaping
Every step you write manually is a step Keploy can eliminate. The difference isn't just time — it's the feedback loop that determines how fast your team ships.
The test maintenance trap
With Starterly, every feature commit generates a hidden tax — a follow-up "fix tests" commit. The commit history tells the whole story.
Switch from Starterly in minutes
Choose the path that fits your workflow. Both are up and running the same day.
Install, record real API traffic, then replay it as regression tests — zero code changes, zero framework dependencies.
# 1. Installcurl --silent -O https://keploy.io/install.sh && source install.sh# 2. Record your traffickeploy record -c "your-start-command"# 3. Replay as testskeploy test -c "your-start-command" --delay 10Paste your cURLs, drop in an OpenAPI spec or Postman collection, and click Generate. Keploy builds your test suite in seconds.
Real-world scenarios
How Keploy handles the challenges your team actually faces.
Greenfield Test Coverage
Keploy captures API traffic from running the application and generates integration tests instantly. Even new projects get real-behavior tests from day one without writing test code.
Starterly analyzes the codebase and generates unit tests using AI. It can quickly create test files for functions that have no existing tests, boosting coverage metrics rapidly.
Legacy Application Testing
Keploy records real traffic to legacy APIs and creates test suites without modifying legacy code. Auto-generated mocks ensure tests run independently of external systems.
Starterly can analyze legacy code and generate unit tests for existing functions. It helps add test coverage to codebases that were developed without tests originally.
What you write vs what Keploy writes
The same test coverage — one approach takes hours of setup and ongoing maintenance, the other takes five minutes and zero boilerplate.
Every new endpoint needs a new file. Every refactor breaks tests. Every non-deterministic value (timestamps, IDs) needs custom handling.
Keploy captures the real request, response, and all dependency calls. Non-deterministic fields are auto-detected and excluded from assertions.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about choosing between Keploy and Starterly.
Looking for a Starterly alternative?
Engineering teams evaluating Starterly alternatives often compare it with Keploy for API testing and regression coverage. Keploy captures real production traffic via eBPF and auto-generates tests with dependency mocks — requiring zero code changes. The key differences come down to how tests are generated (traffic-based vs manual), how dependencies are mocked (automatic vs configured), and what infrastructure changes are needed (none vs SDK/sidecar/containers).
Ready to stop writing tests manually?
Keploy captures your real API traffic and turns it into a regression suite automatically. Zero code changes. Full coverage from day one.
