
What WireMock Can’t Test, Keploy Cancatch what breaks
Flexible HTTP API Mock Server
Keploy auto-generates both tests and mocks from real API traffic using eBPF, while WireMock is an HTTP mock server where you manually define request/response mappings. Keploy is a complete testing solution that generates tests automatically, whereas WireMock is a mocking tool you integrate into your existing test framework.
How Keploy turns real traffic into a test suite
One pipeline, running the moment your app receives a request. No SDKs, no sidecars, no test scripts — just kernel-level capture that becomes deterministic regression coverage.
- 01Real API trafficLive requests + responses from your running app
- 02eBPF captureKernel-level recording — zero code changes
- 03NormalizeTime-freeze + field noise removed automatically
- 04Generate testsDeterministic test cases from actual behavior
- 05Generate mocksEvery downstream dependency stubbed for you
- 06Replay in CIRuns locally, in CI, or in-cluster on Kubernetes
- 07Regression detectionDiffs flagged before they reach production
See how the capture-replay engine works under the hood.
Trusted by engineering teams at scale




















































Why teams switch from WireMock
Keploy eliminates manual test authoring by generating tests automatically from real traffic — no scripts, no stubs, no infrastructure setup.
You want auto-generated tests AND mocks from real traffic
Your team does not want to manually configure mock mappings
You need a complete testing solution, not just a mocking tool
The numbers behind the switch
Industry data on how much manual testing costs teams — and what Keploy delivers from the first recording session.
Writing tests, configuring mocks, debugging flakiness — not building features that ship.
A routine rename or interface change silently invalidates more than half your suite.
Keploy generates tests from every request your API actually handles — no guessing.
Traffic capture reaches edge cases, error paths, and concurrent requests no dev would write.
Pain stats sourced from developer productivity surveys. Coverage stats from Keploy production recording sessions across 50+ engineering teams.
Every number here comes from teams running Keploy in CI.
Zero code. Real tests. Automatically.
Keploy's eBPF agent intercepts every API call at the kernel level and turns live traffic into test cases with dependency mocks — no SDK, no sidecars, no annotations.
Incoming API Requests
Every API call your app makes gets captured, replayed as a test, and its dependencies auto-mocked — continuously, from real traffic.
How they compare, dimension by dimension
A logical breakdown across the dimensions that matter. Click any row for real-world KPI impact across industries.
Auto-generates tests from real API traffic
Mock server only — does not generate tests
Zero code changes for test and mock generation
Configuration for stub mappings required
Auto-generates mocks from recorded traffic
Manual stub definition or record-playback mode
Native CLI, Docker, GitHub Actions support
Standalone server, Docker, or JUnit integration
Go, Java, Node.js, Python and more
Language-agnostic HTTP server with Java SDK
Apache 2.0, fully open source, 20K+ stars
Apache 2.0, open source, very widely adopted
Click any dimension to see real-world KPI impact across industries.
Dive into how each capability actually works.
Your tests miss more than you think
Manual tests cover paths developers remember to write — usually just the happy path. Keploy captures every pattern production traffic actually generates.
Coverage grid shows 8 common endpoints × 10 production scenario types. Manual tests cover only what developers remember to write. Keploy captures every pattern your API actually serves in production.
Keploy is open source — read the code that captures this coverage.
The infrastructure you're maintaining
Traditional testing stacks require a shadow infrastructure to exist alongside your real app. Keploy eliminates all of it — tests and mocks come from actual traffic, not from services you run and maintain.
How they work differently
Architectural differences that affect workflow, cost, and velocity.
Keploy captures real API traffic and generates both tests and dependency mocks automatically. The entire testing workflow — capture, mock generation, and test replay — is handled by one tool with zero code changes needed.
WireMock is an HTTP mock server that simulates APIs by matching requests against configured stubs. You define request patterns and response bodies manually or record them from a running service. It is used alongside your existing test framework, not as a standalone test generator.
When to use each tool
Specific scenarios where each tool delivers the most value.
Keploy is the better fit when…
- You want auto-generated tests AND mocks from real traffic
- Your team does not want to manually configure mock mappings
- You need a complete testing solution, not just a mocking tool
- You prefer zero-code-change setup with eBPF capture
- You want production-realistic mocks without manual maintenance
WireMock is the better fit when…
- You need a standalone mock server for frontend or contract testing
- Your team wants fine-grained control over mock responses and delays
- You need to simulate specific error scenarios and edge cases
- You want a mature, widely-adopted mock server with extensive ecosystem
- You need mock servers for development environments and local testing
Compare the full workflow for your own stack.
The workflow you're escaping
Same starting point, same finish line. One path is short because Keploy does the tedious middle for you — the other is where teams lose days every sprint.
Without Keploy (WireMock / manual)
Every dependency is your problem, and every code change ripples back through the test suite you hand-built.
With Keploy
Record once from real traffic, replay anywhere. Tests and mocks are generated and stay in sync automatically.
Cut the maintenance middle out of your test suite.
The test maintenance trap
With WireMock, every feature commit generates a hidden tax — a follow-up "fix tests" commit. The commit history tells the whole story.
Deterministic replays, no flaky tests — see how.
Switch from WireMock in minutes
Choose the path that fits your workflow. Both are up and running the same day.
Install, record real API traffic, then replay it as regression tests — zero code changes, zero framework dependencies.
# 1. Installcurl --silent -O https://keploy.io/install.sh && source install.sh# 2. Record your traffickeploy record -c "your-start-command"# 3. Replay as testskeploy test -c "your-start-command" --delay 10Paste your cURLs, drop in an OpenAPI spec or Postman collection, and click Generate. Keploy builds your test suite in seconds.
Real-world scenarios
How Keploy handles the challenges your team actually faces.
API Mocking for Tests
Keploy auto-generates mocks from recorded API traffic. Mocks are realistic because they come from real interactions. No manual stub configuration is needed.
WireMock provides highly configurable mock servers where you define exact request matching rules and responses. You have full control over mock behavior, delays, and fault injection.
Regression Test Suites
Keploy generates complete regression test suites from traffic capture. Tests and mocks are created together, providing an end-to-end regression testing solution.
WireMock provides mocks but you write regression tests separately using your test framework. WireMock's record-playback mode can capture responses but does not create test assertions.
Join the teams shipping with confidence on Keploy.
What you write vs what Keploy writes
The same test coverage — one approach takes hours of setup and ongoing maintenance, the other takes five minutes and zero boilerplate.
Every new endpoint needs a new file. Every refactor breaks tests. Every non-deterministic value (timestamps, IDs) needs custom handling.
Keploy captures the real request, response, and all dependency calls. Non-deterministic fields are auto-detected and excluded from assertions.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about choosing between Keploy and WireMock.
Still have questions? The docs and community can help.
Looking for a WireMock alternative?
Engineering teams evaluating WireMock alternatives often compare it with Keploy for API testing and regression coverage. Keploy captures real production traffic via eBPF and auto-generates tests with dependency mocks — requiring zero code changes. The key differences come down to how tests are generated (traffic-based vs manual), how dependencies are mocked (automatic vs configured), and what infrastructure changes are needed (none vs SDK/sidecar/containers).
Ready to stop writing tests manually?
Keploy captures your real API traffic and turns it into a regression suite automatically. Zero code changes. Full coverage from day one.