
What Akto Can’t Test, Keploy Cancatch what breaks
Auto-Generated Functional Tests and Mocks vs API Security Testing
Both Keploy and Akto observe API traffic and are open source, but they solve different problems. Keploy turns captured traffic into deterministic functional regression tests with auto-generated mocks. Akto discovers your API inventory from traffic and runs 1000+ security tests for vulnerabilities like BOLA, broken authentication, and the OWASP API Top 10. Choose Keploy to catch behavioral regressions; choose Akto to catch security vulnerabilities.
How Keploy turns real traffic into a test suite
One pipeline, running the moment your app receives a request. No SDKs, no sidecars, no test scripts — just kernel-level capture that becomes deterministic regression coverage.
- 01Real API trafficLive requests + responses from your running app
- 02eBPF captureKernel-level recording — zero code changes
- 03NormalizeTime-freeze + field noise removed automatically
- 04Generate testsDeterministic test cases from actual behavior
- 05Generate mocksEvery downstream dependency stubbed for you
- 06Replay in CIRuns locally, in CI, or in-cluster on Kubernetes
- 07Regression detectionDiffs flagged before they reach production
See how the capture-replay engine works under the hood.
Trusted by engineering teams at scale




















































Why teams switch from Akto
Keploy eliminates manual test authoring by generating tests automatically from real traffic — no scripts, no stubs, no infrastructure setup.
Want functional regression tests that fail a PR when API behavior changes
Need automatic mocks for databases and downstream services to test in isolation
Require handling of non-deterministic fields like timestamps automatically
The numbers behind the switch
Industry data on how much manual testing costs teams — and what Keploy delivers from the first recording session.
Writing tests, configuring mocks, debugging flakiness — not building features that ship.
A routine rename or interface change silently invalidates more than half your suite.
Keploy generates tests from every request your API actually handles — no guessing.
Traffic capture reaches edge cases, error paths, and concurrent requests no dev would write.
Pain stats sourced from developer productivity surveys. Coverage stats from Keploy production recording sessions across 50+ engineering teams.
Every number here comes from teams running Keploy in CI.
Zero code. Real tests. Automatically.
Keploy's eBPF agent intercepts every API call at the kernel level and turns live traffic into test cases with dependency mocks — no SDK, no sidecars, no annotations.
Incoming API Requests
Every API call your app makes gets captured, replayed as a test, and its dependencies auto-mocked — continuously, from real traffic.
How they compare, dimension by dimension
A logical breakdown across the dimensions that matter. Click any row for real-world KPI impact across industries.
Functional regression testing from real traffic
API discovery and security vulnerability testing
Zero code changes needed to instrument or capture
No code changes; ingests traffic from proxies, gateways, eBPF
Behavioral pass/fail against recorded responses
1000+ security tests for OWASP/HackerOne API Top 10
Auto-generates mocks for all downstream dependencies
No mocks; tests run against live APIs
Captures exercised endpoints from traffic
Builds a continuous inventory including shadow APIs
Built-in time-freezing and field normalization
Traffic analysis to reduce security-test false positives
Click any dimension to see real-world KPI impact across industries.
Dive into how each capability actually works.
Your tests miss more than you think
Manual tests cover paths developers remember to write — usually just the happy path. Keploy captures every pattern production traffic actually generates.
Coverage grid shows 8 common endpoints × 10 production scenario types. Manual tests cover only what developers remember to write. Keploy captures every pattern your API actually serves in production.
Keploy is open source — read the code that captures this coverage.
The infrastructure you're maintaining
Traditional testing stacks require a shadow infrastructure to exist alongside your real app. Keploy eliminates all of it — tests and mocks come from actual traffic, not from services you run and maintain.
How they work differently
Architectural differences that affect workflow, cost, and velocity.
Keploy uses eBPF to record real API calls and downstream dependency calls, then replays them as deterministic functional regression tests with auto-generated mocks. It handles non-deterministic fields like timestamps through time-freezing so replays produce reliable pass/fail results. It focuses on correctness of behavior and runs locally, in CI, or on Kubernetes.
Akto builds an inventory of your APIs by observing traffic through proxies, gateways, eBPF, or specs, then runs security tests against them. It ships 1000+ pre-built tests for BOLA, broken authentication, SSRF, and the OWASP and HackerOne API Top 10, supports custom tests, and flags sensitive data exposure. It runs in CI/CD and as a continuous API security posture platform.
When to use each tool
Specific scenarios where each tool delivers the most value.
Keploy is the better fit when…
- Want functional regression tests that fail a PR when API behavior changes
- Need automatic mocks for databases and downstream services to test in isolation
- Require handling of non-deterministic fields like timestamps automatically
- Focus is correctness and preventing behavioral regressions, not vulnerabilities
- Want deterministic replays across languages driven by real traffic
Akto is the better fit when…
- Need to discover and inventory all APIs, including shadow and undocumented ones
- Want to test for OWASP API Top 10 vulnerabilities like BOLA and broken auth
- Need continuous API security posture monitoring in CI/CD
- Must detect sensitive data exposure across API responses
- Your priority is application security rather than functional correctness
Compare the full workflow for your own stack.
The workflow you're escaping
Same starting point, same finish line. One path is short because Keploy does the tedious middle for you — the other is where teams lose days every sprint.
Without Keploy (Akto / manual)
Every dependency is your problem, and every code change ripples back through the test suite you hand-built.
With Keploy
Record once from real traffic, replay anywhere. Tests and mocks are generated and stay in sync automatically.
Cut the maintenance middle out of your test suite.
The test maintenance trap
With Akto, every feature commit generates a hidden tax — a follow-up "fix tests" commit. The commit history tells the whole story.
Deterministic replays, no flaky tests — see how.
Switch from Akto in minutes
Choose the path that fits your workflow. Both are up and running the same day.
Install, record real API traffic, then replay it as regression tests — zero code changes, zero framework dependencies.
# 1. Installcurl --silent -O https://keploy.io/install.sh && source install.sh# 2. Record your traffickeploy record -c "your-start-command"# 3. Replay as testskeploy test -c "your-start-command" --delay 10Paste your cURLs, drop in an OpenAPI spec or Postman collection, and click Generate. Keploy builds your test suite in seconds.
Real-world scenarios
How Keploy handles the challenges your team actually faces.
You want to stop shipping code that changes API behavior unexpectedly
Keploy captures traffic, records expected responses and mocks, and fails a PR in CI when behavior drifts, giving you functional regression protection.
Akto is not designed to catch functional regressions. It verifies whether APIs are vulnerable, not whether a response body changed for a valid request, so behavioral drift would pass its checks.
You need to find security vulnerabilities in your APIs
Keploy focuses on functional correctness and does not run security tests, so it will not surface issues like BOLA, broken authentication, or SSRF.
Akto is built for this. It discovers APIs from traffic and runs 1000+ security tests covering the OWASP and HackerOne API Top 10, flagging vulnerabilities and sensitive data exposure in CI and at runtime.
Join the teams shipping with confidence on Keploy.
What you write vs what Keploy writes
The same test coverage — one approach takes hours of setup and ongoing maintenance, the other takes five minutes and zero boilerplate.
Every new endpoint needs a new file. Every refactor breaks tests. Every non-deterministic value (timestamps, IDs) needs custom handling.
Keploy captures the real request, response, and all dependency calls. Non-deterministic fields are auto-detected and excluded from assertions.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about choosing between Keploy and Akto.
Still have questions? The docs and community can help.
Looking for a Akto alternative?
Engineering teams evaluating Akto alternatives often compare it with Keploy for API testing and regression coverage. Keploy captures real production traffic via eBPF and auto-generates tests with dependency mocks — requiring zero code changes. The key differences come down to how tests are generated (traffic-based vs manual), how dependencies are mocked (automatic vs configured), and what infrastructure changes are needed (none vs SDK/sidecar/containers).
Ready to stop writing tests manually?
Keploy captures your real API traffic and turns it into a regression suite automatically. Zero code changes. Full coverage from day one.