Keploy logo
Fiber logo

Keploy as a Fiber testing framework

Keploy tests Fiber applications by recording real requests through the running server and every SQL or outbound call they trigger, then replaying both as assertions. The fasthttp handler chain runs in full, because the request arrived over a real socket.

Generate Fiber tests free
keploy record -c "./orders-api"
18.4K+VS Code1.2M+300M+mocks created

What Keploy gives a Fiber team

Any Fiber app, unchanged

Keploy runs the binary you build. Fiber sits on fasthttp rather than net/http, and capture happens below both — so the router, groups, and middleware all execute unchanged.

  • Fiber v2 and above
  • Route groups and nested middleware
  • fasthttp handler chain
  • No test-only fiber.New()
The problem

Why Fiber integration tests slow teams down

The friction is rarely the assertions. It is everything around them — spinning up dependencies, keeping mocks honest, and repairing tests after every refactor.

Three ways to do it

Testing Fiber: by hand, with testify + httptest, or with Keploy

app.Test drives an app the test file assembled, so middleware from main is missing. Keploy records the running binary, so the server under test is the one you deploy.

Select any row for the full comparison, with code.

Same coverage, three costs

What you write for Fiber vs what Keploy records

All three produce the same assertion. Only the third still passes after the next refactor without anyone editing it.

By hand2–4 hours
handler_manual_test.go
hand-written
// Hand-written: an app assembled here, not in main.
package api
 
func TestConfirmOrder(t *testing.T) {
app := fiber.New()
// Note what is missing: recover, logger, and JWT from main.
app.Post("/orders/:id/confirm", NewHandler(fakeRepo{}, fakePayments{}).Confirm)
 
body := strings.NewReader(`{"paymentToken":"tok_123"}`)
req := httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/orders/ord_1/confirm", body)
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
 
res, err := app.Test(req)
if err != nil || res.StatusCode != 200 {
t.Fatalf("got %v status %d", err, res.StatusCode)
}
}

The app is built here, so an unauthorised request passes: the JWT middleware main registers is not part of this chain.

testify + httptest1–2 hours
handler_sqlmock_test.go
tool-assisted
// testify + sqlmock + an httptest stub upstream.
package api
 
func TestConfirmOrder(t *testing.T) {
db, mock, _ := sqlmock.New()
defer db.Close()
 
// The query now lives in two places.
mock.ExpectQuery("SELECT id, amount_minor, state FROM orders").
WithArgs("ord_1").
WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"id", "amount_minor", "state"}).
AddRow("ord_1", 4200, "NEW"))
 
upstream := httptest.NewServer(stripeStub())
defer upstream.Close()
 
res := serve(t, NewRepo(db), NewPayments(upstream.URL))
 
assert.Equal(t, 200, res.StatusCode)
assert.NoError(t, mock.ExpectationsWereMet())
}

Fast and idiomatic — and the SQL is duplicated while stripeStub() is a handler someone keeps current by hand.

With Keploy~5 minutes
test-1.yaml
auto-generated
# Recorded with: keploy record -c './orders-api'
# Nobody wrote this file. Keploy captured it from a real request.
version: api.keploy.io/v1beta1
kind: Http
name: test-1
spec:
req:
method: POST
url: /orders/ord_1/confirm
header:
Authorization: Bearer <captured>
body: '{"paymentToken":"tok_123"}'
resp:
status_code: 200
body:
id: "ord_1"
state: "CONFIRMED"
amountMinor: 4200
noise:
- body.confirmedAt
mocks:
- kind: Postgres
operation: "SELECT id, amount_minor, state FROM orders WHERE id = $1"
- kind: Http
url: https://api.payments.example.com/v1/payment_intents/tok_123/confirm

The recorded case travelled the real fasthttp chain from main, so the JWT check and BodyParser both ran before the handler saw it.

Times are estimates for authoring one endpoint’s coverage from scratch, not measurements.

Keploy vs the alternatives

Fiber testing tools, compared

The options a team on Go actually reaches for, and where each one genuinely wins. Select a row for the full comparison.

Best in classStrongPartialNot covered

Assessments reflect each tool’s documented behaviour, not benchmark measurements.

How it works

Record your Fiber app once, replay it forever

Keploy sits below your Fiber process at the network layer. It watches the calls your app already makes, then serves them back on replay so tests run with no dependencies attached.

Keploy records a GET call to /api/v1/orders/{id} on a Fiber service and captures the dependency calls it makes.

Fiber logo
Your Fiber app
GET/api/v1/orders/{id}200
RecordingKeploy proxyeBPF · userspace
+3 more Fiber dependencies
An example shape of a captured call. Your own endpoints and dependencies come from your real traffic, so nothing here has to be written by hand.
Mock coverage

What Keploy mocks for Fiber, with zero config

7 of the 7 dependencies a typical Fiber service talks to are stubbed from the recording itself — no mock classes, no fixture files, no containers in CI.

Quick start

Your first Fiber test suite in under five minutes

Every command below runs against your existing Fiber service. Nothing in your source tree changes.

  1. 1Install the Keploy CLI

    A single binary. It needs a Linux kernel with eBPF support, or Docker on macOS and Windows — and it adds nothing to your project's dependencies.

    curl -sSL https://keploy.io/install.sh | bash
  2. 2Record your service

    Pass the command you already use to start the app. Keploy runs it and watches every socket it opens.

    keploy record -c "./orders-api"
  3. 3Exercise the paths you care about

    Drive the running server. Every request becomes a test case with its database and HTTP calls captured alongside.

    go build -o orders-api ./cmd/api
    curl -X POST localhost:8080/orders/ord_1/confirm -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -H 'Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN' -d '{"paymentToken":"tok_123"}'
  4. 4Replay in CI

    Replay serves the recorded dependency responses, so the job needs no service containers and no Docker daemon.

    keploy test -c "./orders-api" --delay 6

Ready to try it on your own Fiber service?

Ecosystem

Works with the rest of your Fiber stack

Keploy records at the network layer, so framework and driver choices inside your Fiber app do not change how it captures traffic.

FAQ

Fiber testing with Keploy: common questions

Join our GlobalCommunity

Connect with developers worldwide. Follow updates, ask questions, share feedback, and ship faster with other Keploy builders.

1.2M+Installs
18.4K+GitHub
100K+Devs
300M+Mocks
1K+Contributors
#1OSS Trending
4.9★★★★★from 500+ reviews onG2GartnerVS CodeChrome
★★★★★

Best report of integration and API tests I've seen — which we don't get from RestAssured.

G2
★★★★★

Future of microservices testing. I don't write tests now!

G2 · 5/5
★★★★★

An amazing product that simplifies the automation.

Gartner · 4.0
XGitHubSlackYouTubeLinkedIn
Built by developers, for developers.Let's build the future, together.