Keploy logo
SQLite logo

Keploy as a SQLite testing framework

Keploy records the queries your app issues against SQLite together with the rows returned, then replays them during tests. CI needs no fixture database file, no schema rebuild, and no seed step — and the recorded rows come from a real SQLite engine.

Generate SQLite tests free
keploy record -c "./orders-service"
18.4K+VS Code1.2M+300M+mocks created

What Keploy gives a SQLite team

Captured at the query boundary

SQLite is in-process rather than a server, so Keploy records at the driver boundary: the statement, its bound parameters, and the rows returned. What replays is what the real engine produced.

  • Statements captured with bound parameters
  • Real rows and column types
  • Transactions replay in order
  • Below the driver, above the file
The problem

Why SQLite integration tests slow teams down

The friction is rarely the assertions. It is everything around them — spinning up dependencies, keeping mocks honest, and repairing tests after every refactor.

Three ways to do it

Testing SQLite: by hand, with in-memory SQLite, or with Keploy

An in-memory SQLite database is fast and needs its schema rebuilt every run. Keploy records the rows a request actually read, so replay needs neither a schema nor a file.

Select any row for the full comparison, with code.

Same coverage, three costs

What you write for SQLite vs what Keploy records

All three produce the same assertion. Only the third still passes after the next refactor without anyone editing it.

By hand2–4 hours
order_store_stub.go
hand-written
// Hand-written stub: no SQL is parsed or type-converted.
package store
 
type StubOrderStore struct {
rows map[string]Order
}
 
func NewStubOrderStore() *StubOrderStore {
return &StubOrderStore{rows: map[string]Order{
"ord_1": {ID: "ord_1", AmountMinor: 4200, State: "NEW"},
}}
}
 
func (s *StubOrderStore) Get(id string) (Order, error) {
return s.rows[id], nil
}
 
func (s *StubOrderStore) SetState(id, state string) error {
// No CHECK constraint or NOT NULL is enforced here.
o := s.rows[id]
o.State = state
s.rows[id] = o
return nil
}

Column affinity, constraints, and SQLite's flexible typing are all absent, so a type surprise reaches production unseen.

in-memory SQLite1–2 hours
order_store_test.go
tool-assisted
// In-memory SQLite: real engine, schema rebuilt per test.
package store
 
import (
"database/sql"
"testing"
_ "modernc.org/sqlite"
)
 
func TestReadsASeededOrder(t *testing.T) {
db, err := sql.Open("sqlite", ":memory:")
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer db.Close()
 
// Rebuilt for every test in the package.
mustExec(t, db, schemaSQL)
mustExec(t, db, `INSERT INTO orders VALUES ('ord_1', 4200, 'NEW')`)
 
order, err := New(db).Get("ord_1")
if err != nil || order.AmountMinor != 4200 {
t.Fatalf("got %+v err %v", order, err)
}
}

Real SQLite semantics and no server — and the schema plus seed data are rebuilt in every test, and this is not the database production runs.

With Keploy~5 minutes
mocks.yaml
auto-generated
# Recorded with: keploy record -c './orders-service'
# The SQLite response, captured at the driver boundary.
version: api.keploy.io/v1beta1
kind: SQL
name: mock-2
spec:
request:
query: "SELECT id, amount_minor, state FROM orders WHERE id = ?"
params:
- "ord_1"
response:
columns:
- name: id
type: TEXT
- name: amount_minor
type: INTEGER
- name: state
type: TEXT
rows:
- id: "ord_1"
amount_minor: 4200
state: "NEW"
rows_affected: 0

No fixture file and no schema rebuild: the statement and the rows the engine returned are recorded together and replayed as a pair.

Times are estimates for authoring one endpoint’s coverage from scratch, not measurements.

Keploy vs the alternatives

SQLite testing tools, compared

The options a team on relational databases actually reaches for, and where each one genuinely wins. Select a row for the full comparison.

Best in classStrongPartialNot covered

Assessments reflect each tool’s documented behaviour, not benchmark measurements.

How it works

Record your SQLite app once, replay it forever

Keploy sits below your SQLite process at the network layer. It watches the calls your app already makes, then serves them back on replay so tests run with no dependencies attached.

Keploy records a GET call to /api/v1/orders/{id} on a SQLite service and captures the dependency calls it makes.

SQLite logo
Your SQLite app
GET/api/v1/orders/{id}200
RecordingKeploy proxyeBPF · userspace
+2 more SQLite clients
An example shape of a captured call. Your own endpoints and dependencies come from your real traffic, so nothing here has to be written by hand.
Quick start

Your first SQLite test suite in under five minutes

Every command below runs against your existing SQLite service. Nothing in your source tree changes.

  1. 1Install the Keploy CLI

    A single binary. It needs a Linux kernel with eBPF support, or Docker on macOS and Windows — and it adds nothing to your project's dependencies.

    curl -sSL https://keploy.io/install.sh | bash
  2. 2Record your service

    Pass the command you already use to start the app. Keploy runs it and watches every socket it opens.

    keploy record -c "./orders-service"
  3. 3Exercise the paths you care about

    Run the app against your development database file. Every statement and the rows it returned are captured together.

    curl localhost:8080/orders/ord_1
    curl localhost:8080/orders/summary?state=NEW
  4. 4Replay in CI

    Replay serves the recorded dependency responses, so the job needs no service containers and no Docker daemon.

    keploy test -c "./orders-service" --delay 6

Ready to try it on your own SQLite service?

Ecosystem

Works with the rest of your SQLite stack

Keploy records at the network layer, so framework and driver choices inside your SQLite app do not change how it captures traffic.

FAQ

SQLite testing with Keploy: common questions

Join our GlobalCommunity

Connect with developers worldwide. Follow updates, ask questions, share feedback, and ship faster with other Keploy builders.

1.2M+Installs
18.4K+GitHub
100K+Devs
300M+Mocks
1K+Contributors
#1OSS Trending
4.9★★★★★from 500+ reviews onG2GartnerVS CodeChrome
★★★★★

Best report of integration and API tests I've seen — which we don't get from RestAssured.

G2
★★★★★

Future of microservices testing. I don't write tests now!

G2 · 5/5
★★★★★

An amazing product that simplifies the automation.

Gartner · 4.0
XGitHubSlackYouTubeLinkedIn
Built by developers, for developers.Let's build the future, together.