Keploy as a TypeScript testing framework
Keploy tests TypeScript services by recording the compiled process at the network layer, then replaying real requests and dependency responses as assertions. Because nothing inside the process is substituted, there are no typed mock factories to maintain and no casts to satisfy a partial double.
keploy record -c "node dist/server.js"What Keploy gives a TypeScript team
Any TypeScript service, unchanged
Keploy records the compiled process, so the type system is invisible to capture. Express, Fastify, NestJS, Hono, and tRPC all record identically, whether you build with tsc, esbuild, or tsx.
- TypeScript 4.5 and above
- tsc, esbuild, swc, or tsx
- CommonJS and ESM output
- Decorators and strict mode alike
Why TypeScript integration tests slow teams down
The friction is rarely the assertions. It is everything around them — spinning up dependencies, keeping mocks honest, and repairing tests after every refactor.
Testing TypeScript: by hand, with Jest + typed mocks, or with Keploy
A typed mock is checked for shape and never for content, so a structurally valid wrong response passes. Keploy records what the dependency actually sent, which is the half the compiler cannot see.
Select any row for the full comparison, with code.
What you write for TypeScript vs what Keploy records
All three produce the same assertion. Only the third still passes after the next refactor without anyone editing it.
The cast on payments is the tell: the double does not fully implement the interface, so the type safety that justified the interface is switched off exactly where it mattered.
The factory keeps the compiler happy and the Stripe body is still a literal — typed against your own interface, not against Stripe's contract.
The recorded body is Stripe's actual response, so a field your types do not model yet is still captured — and appears the day your code starts reading it.
Times are estimates for authoring one endpoint’s coverage from scratch, not measurements.
TypeScript testing tools, compared
The options a team on Node.js actually reaches for, and where each one genuinely wins. Select a row for the full comparison.
Assessments reflect each tool’s documented behaviour, not benchmark measurements.
Record your TypeScript app once, replay it forever
Keploy sits below your TypeScript process at the network layer. It watches the calls your app already makes, then serves them back on replay so tests run with no dependencies attached.
Keploy records a GET call to /api/v1/orders/{id} on a TypeScript service and captures the dependency calls it makes.
What Keploy mocks for TypeScript, with zero config
7 of the 7 dependencies a typical TypeScript service talks to are stubbed from the recording itself — no mock classes, no fixture files, no containers in CI.
- Auto-mocked
PostgreSQLView page
Postgres frontend/backend protocol
- Auto-mocked
MySQLView page
MySQL wire protocol
- Auto-mocked
MongoDBView page
MongoDB wire protocol
- Auto-mocked
RedisView page
RESP over TCP
- Auto-mocked
Apache KafkaView page
Kafka producer and consumer protocol
- Auto-mocked
gRPCView page
HTTP/2 framed gRPC calls
- Outbound HTTPAuto-mocked
Outbound HTTP
Any HTTP client call the service makes
Your first TypeScript test suite in under five minutes
Every command below runs against your existing TypeScript service. Nothing in your source tree changes.
1Install the Keploy CLI
A single binary. It needs a Linux kernel with eBPF support, or Docker on macOS and Windows — and it adds nothing to your project's dependencies.
curl -sSL https://keploy.io/install.sh | bash2Record your service
Pass the command you already use to start the app. Keploy runs it and watches every socket it opens.
keploy record -c "node dist/server.js"3Exercise the paths you care about
Build as normal, then drive the compiled process. Every request becomes a test case with its database and HTTP calls captured alongside.
npm run buildcurl -X POST localhost:3000/orders/ord_1/confirm -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"paymentToken":"tok_123"}'4Replay in CI
Replay serves the recorded dependency responses, so the job needs no service containers and no Docker daemon.
keploy test -c "node dist/server.js" --delay 8
Ready to try it on your own TypeScript service?
Works with the rest of your TypeScript stack
Keploy records at the network layer, so framework and driver choices inside your TypeScript app do not change how it captures traffic.
Node.js
The runtime page covers driver-level coverage in depth.
NestJS
Decorators and the DI container are invisible to capture.
Prisma
Queries record as the protocol they emit, not as client calls.
Fastify
Compiled schema validation runs on every recorded request.
PostgreSQL
The database page covers protocol-level capture in depth.
Express
The framework page covers middleware-level capture.
Testing the rest of your stack
- Languages
Keploy as a Node.js testing framework
Replace nock registrations and in-memory database fixtures with tests recorded from the traffic your Node service already serves.
Read the guide - Frameworks
Keploy as a NestJS testing framework
Test NestJS controllers through the real HTTP server instead of a Test.createTestingModule graph with every provider mocked.
Read the guide - Frameworks
Keploy as a Express testing framework
Test the whole middleware chain, not a hand-built app instance — Keploy records real requests through your Express router and replays them.
Read the guide - Frameworks
Keploy as a Fastify testing framework
Test Fastify routes through the real server rather than app.inject, with schema validation and hooks genuinely exercised.
Read the guide - Databases
Keploy as a PostgreSQL testing framework
Record the Postgres frontend/backend protocol once and replay real result sets in tests — no container, no pg-mem, no schema to rebuild.
Read the guide
Join our GlobalCommunity
Connect with developers worldwide. Follow updates, ask questions, share feedback, and ship faster with other Keploy builders.
“Best report of integration and API tests I've seen — which we don't get from RestAssured.”
G2“Future of microservices testing. I don't write tests now!”
G2 · 5/5“An amazing product that simplifies the automation.”
Gartner · 4.0