Do I need the provider sending callbacks to replay?

No. The recorded deliveries are replayed from the test set against your handler, so a replay run needs no tunnel and no provider sandbox. You need those once, during the recording pass.

Is my HTTP handler still exercised?

Yes. Keploy replays at the protocol, so the client parses, converts and decodes exactly as it does in production. That is the difference from a stubbed client, which skips all of it.

How do I refresh the recordings?

Record again. One command re-captures every Webhooks interaction, so a schema or response change surfaces as a diff instead of a stale fixture that still passes.

Can I test signature verification?

Yes, and this is where recording helps most: the real signature header is captured, so the verification path runs against a genuine signature rather than one you generated.

Does Keploy replace WireMock?

Not where you need the real engine, and that is worth being clear about. Use WireMock when a test genuinely has to exercise Webhooks itself. Keploy covers the much larger set of tests that only need the responses.

Keploy as a Webhooks testing framework

Keploy records the inbound callbacks a provider delivered to your service, then replays those exact requests against your handler in tests. The handler runs unchanged on every run, but CI needs no tunnel, no sandbox account and no payload written by hand.

Generate Webhooks tests free

keploy record -c "<your app start command>"

18.5K+

1.2M+300M+mocks createdSlack

What Keploy gives a Webhooks team

Every Webhooks call your service makes

Keploy records the webhook deliveries your service received, so a handler can be tested by replaying the exact payloads a provider actually sent.

Real provider payloads captured
Signature headers captured
Retry deliveries kept
No tunnel needed

Try Keploy for free Explore the docs

The problem

Why Webhooks integration tests slow teams down

The friction is rarely the assertions. It is everything around them — spinning up dependencies, keeping mocks honest, and repairing tests after every refactor.

Book a call Explore the docs

Three ways to do it

Testing Webhooks: by hand, with WireMock, or with Keploy

A provider sandbox and a tunnel give genuine deliveries at the cost of setup and a reachable network. A hand-written payload is cheap but only ever matches itself. Keploy replays what the provider actually sent.

By hand

WireMock

With Keploy

Select any row for the full comparison, with code.

Get started Book a call

Same coverage, three costs

What you write for Webhooks vs what Keploy records

All three produce the same assertion. Only the third still passes after the next refactor without anyone editing it.

By hand2–4 hours

order_repository_test.py

hand-written

from unittest.mock import MagicMock

# A stub Webhooks client: every reply is typed out here.

def test_reads_an_order():

client = MagicMock()

client.fetch.return_value = {

"id": "o-1",

"total": 4200,

"status": "NEW",

}

order = OrderRepository(client).find("o-1")

assert order.total == 4200

# Nothing here exercised the driver, so a type or encoding

# change in the real reply cannot fail this test.

A hand-written stub of the Webhooks client. The driver never runs.

WireMock1–2 hours

order_repository_container_test.py

tool-assisted

import pytest

from testcontainers.core.container import DockerContainer

@pytest.fixture(scope="session")

def client():

# Runs a stub provider that posts to the handler. Needs a

# available wherever the tests run, including CI.

with DockerContainer("wiremock/wiremock:latest") as c:

c.start()

yield connect(c.get_container_host_ip(), c.get_exposed_port(0))

def test_reads_an_order(client):

# Schema and seed data are still written by hand.

seed(client, id="o-1", total=4200, status="NEW")

order = OrderRepository(client).find("o-1")

assert order.total == 4200

A provider sandbox delivering over a tunnel. Genuine, and the job pays for it.

With Keploy~5 minutes

keploy/test-set-0/test-1.yaml

auto-generated

version: api.keploy.io/v1beta1

kind: Http

name: test-1

spec:

req:

method: POST

url: /orders/o-1/confirm

resp:

status_code: 200

body: '{"id":"o-1","status":"CONFIRMED","total":4200}'

assertions:

noise:

- body.confirmedAt

---

kind: Http

spec:

request:

url: https://api.payments.example.com/v1/charges

response:

body: '{"status":"AUTHORIZED"}'

---

kind: Http

spec:

request:

url: https://api.payments.example.com/v1/payment_intents/tok_123/confirm

response:

body: '{"status":"AUTHORIZED"}'

Recorded from one real request. Nothing here was typed by hand.

Times are estimates for authoring one endpoint’s coverage from scratch, not measurements.

Explore the docs Request a trial

Keploy vs the alternatives

Webhooks testing tools, compared

The options a team on service and platform integrations actually reaches for, and where each one genuinely wins. Select a row for the full comparison.

Keploy

WireMock

LocalStack

Mountebank

Hoverfly

Postman

SmartBear ReadyAPI

Best in classStrongPartialNot covered

Assessments reflect each tool’s documented behaviour, not benchmark measurements.

Request a trial Book a call

How it works

Record your Webhooks app once, replay it forever

Keploy sits below your Webhooks process at the network layer. It watches the calls your app already makes, then serves them back on replay so tests run with no dependencies attached.

Your Webhooks appGET/api/v1/orders/{id}200

RecordingKeploy proxyeBPF · userspace

Outbound HTTPEvery outbound HTTP call

gRPCHTTP/2 frames from a gRPC clientPartial

PostgreSQLPostgres protocol beneath the driver

RedisRESP beneath the cache client

+2 more Webhooks dependencies

An example shape of a captured call. Your own endpoints and dependencies come from your real traffic, so nothing here has to be written by hand.

Try Keploy for free Request a trial

Mock coverage

What Keploy mocks for Webhooks, with zero config

5 of the 6 dependencies a typical Webhooks service talks to are stubbed from the recording itself — no mock classes, no fixture files, no containers in CI.

Outbound HTTP
Auto-mocked
Outbound HTTP
Every outbound HTTP call
Partial
gRPCView page
HTTP/2 frames from a gRPC client
Auto-mocked
PostgreSQLView page
Postgres protocol beneath the driver
Auto-mocked
RedisView page
RESP beneath the cache client
Auto-mocked
MongoDBView page
Wire protocol beneath the Mongo driver
Auto-mocked
Apache KafkaView page
Kafka protocol beneath the client

Explore the docs Book a call

Quick start

Your first Webhooks test suite in under five minutes

Every command below runs against your existing Webhooks service. Nothing in your source tree changes.

1
1Install the Keploy CLI
A single binary. It needs a Linux kernel with eBPF support, or Docker on macOS and Windows — and it adds nothing to your project's dependencies.
curl -sSL https://keploy.io/install.sh | bash
2
2Record your service
Pass the command you already use to start the app. Keploy runs it and watches every socket it opens.
keploy record -c "<your app start command>"
3
3Exercise the paths you care about
Use curl, your frontend, or an existing smoke script. Every request becomes a test case with its Webhooks calls captured alongside it.
curl -X POST localhost:8080/orders/o-1/confirm
curl localhost:8080/orders/o-1
4
4Replay in CI
Replay serves the recorded dependency responses, so the job needs no service containers and no Docker daemon.
keploy test -c "<your app start command>" --delay 10