Keploy as a Deno testing framework
Keploy tests Deno services by recording real HTTP and database traffic from a running process, then replaying it as assertions. There is no permission grant or stub module and nothing to mock by hand, because capture happens below the runtime at the socket.
keploy record -c "deno run --allow-all main.ts"What Keploy gives a Deno team
Any Deno service, unchanged
Keploy runs the process you already run with deno run. Oak, Hono, Fresh and a bare Deno.serve handler all record identically, because capture is at the socket rather than inside the runtime.
- Deno 1.x and 2.x
- Oak, Hono, Fresh, Deno.serve
- npm: and jsr: specifiers alike
- No import map changes
Why Deno integration tests slow teams down
The friction is rarely the assertions. It is everything around them — spinning up dependencies, keeping mocks honest, and repairing tests after every refactor.
Testing Deno: by hand, with deno test + fetch stubs, or with Keploy
deno test + fetch stubs describes the exchange by hand and still needs the dependency supplied. Keploy records both halves once and replays them with nothing running.
Select any row for the full comparison, with code.
What you write for Deno vs what Keploy records
All three produce the same assertion. Only the third still passes after the next refactor without anyone editing it.
The stub and the fake client exist only for this test.
A stub server per upstream, and a real database to seed.
Recorded from one real request. Nothing here was typed by hand.
Times are estimates for authoring one endpoint’s coverage from scratch, not measurements.
Deno testing tools, compared
The options a team on Node.js actually reaches for, and where each one genuinely wins. Select a row for the full comparison.
Assessments reflect each tool’s documented behaviour, not benchmark measurements.
Record your Deno app once, replay it forever
Keploy sits below your Deno process at the network layer. It watches the calls your app already makes, then serves them back on replay so tests run with no dependencies attached.
Keploy records a GET call to /api/v1/orders/{id} on a Deno service and captures the dependency calls it makes.
What Keploy mocks for Deno, with zero config
5 of the 6 dependencies a typical Deno service talks to are stubbed from the recording itself — no mock classes, no fixture files, no containers in CI.
- Auto-mocked
PostgreSQLView page
Postgres protocol beneath deno-postgres
- Auto-mocked
MySQLView page
MySQL protocol beneath the Deno driver
- Auto-mocked
RedisView page
RESP beneath the Deno Redis client
- Auto-mocked
MongoDBView page
Wire protocol beneath the Deno Mongo driver
- Outbound HTTPAuto-mocked
Outbound HTTP
Every globalThis.fetch call
- Partial
gRPCView page
HTTP/2 frames from a Deno gRPC client
Your first Deno test suite in under five minutes
Every command below runs against your existing Deno service. Nothing in your source tree changes.
1Install the Keploy CLI
A single binary. It needs a Linux kernel with eBPF support, or Docker on macOS and Windows — and it adds nothing to your project's dependencies.
curl -sSL https://keploy.io/install.sh | bash2Record your service
Pass the command you already use to start the app. Keploy runs it and watches every socket it opens.
keploy record -c "deno run --allow-all main.ts"3Exercise the paths you care about
Use curl, your frontend, or an existing smoke script. Every request becomes a test case with its Deno calls captured alongside it.
curl -X POST localhost:8000/orders/o-1/confirmcurl localhost:8000/orders/o-14Replay in CI
Replay serves the recorded dependency responses, so the job needs no service containers and no Docker daemon.
keploy test -c "deno run --allow-all main.ts" --delay 10
Ready to try it on your own Deno service?
Works with the rest of your Deno stack
Keploy records at the network layer, so framework and driver choices inside your Deno app do not change how it captures traffic.
Oak
Middleware and router calls record with no adapter
Hono
Runs on Deno and records the same way
Fresh
API routes record as ordinary handlers
Node.js
The same recording model for a Node service
Bun
Same again, on Bun
TypeScript
Types are irrelevant to capture
Testing the rest of your stack
- Languages
Keploy as a Node.js testing framework
Replace nock registrations and in-memory database fixtures with tests recorded from the traffic your Node service already serves.
Read the guide - Languages
Keploy as a TypeScript testing framework
Get integration coverage for a TypeScript service without typed mock factories, casts, or a ts-jest transform.
Read the guide - Languages
Keploy as a Bun testing framework
Record a running Bun service once and get integration coverage without mocking modules with bun:test.
Read the guide - Frameworks
Keploy as a Hono testing framework
Record a running Hono service once and get integration coverage without stubbing every binding and fetch.
Read the guide - Databases
Keploy as a PostgreSQL testing framework
Record the Postgres frontend/backend protocol once and replay real result sets in tests — no container, no pg-mem, no schema to rebuild.
Read the guide - Caches & Stores
Keploy as a Redis testing framework
Record RESP traffic once and replay real cache hits, misses, TTLs, and pipeline responses without a Redis server in CI.
Read the guide
Join our GlobalCommunity
Connect with developers worldwide. Follow updates, ask questions, share feedback, and ship faster with other Keploy builders.
“Best report of integration and API tests I've seen — which we don't get from RestAssured.”
G2“Future of microservices testing. I don't write tests now!”
G2 · 5/5“An amazing product that simplifies the automation.”
Gartner · 4.0